“The Evacuation of Children in World War Two Was a Great Success”

How far do the springs you have used support this interpretation of voidance in ground war Two? (25 marks) Before the War in family line 1939, the politics understood the risk of air raids and the danger they bring upon major cities in England. Plans for excreting started as early as 15 historic period before in 1924 the Air Raid Precaution Committee (ARPC) set London as the main target, with children as the biggest concern.The government identified, after the ARPC produced a report on the potential disasters of air raid attacks in 1925, that maintaining noncombatant morale was a priority, and that the fear of bombing would bring it down.So, to prevent gloomy morale (and also to ensure safety for what would be the future propagation and social regeneration of Britain), the technique of reasoning by elimination was introduced. Success, in this case, is somewhat difficult to measure as it is a broad term when it comes to communicate if it can be seen as a achiever in term of numbers did the government send out as many spate as they hoped to? or as a question of the winner in the easy being of the evacuees, and questi sensationd as the over whole safety of the evacuees if death and adventure had been avoided/prevented. These stocks help to hand over whether or non body waste in area War Two was a winner.Evacuation can be seen as a success if the evacuees, specifically children were happy. This is important as being considered happy as whether or not they were treated head and were happy would influence the public morale of the citizens remaining in the city.For example, source one shows a group of children with their accompanying teacher in a Berkshire village, 1939. They appear to be happy and well looked after they seem well dressed and smiling in a peaceful, unthreatening looking setting, safely away from the danger of bombs/air raids. Also, as a teacher is shown to be with them, success id further proven in that the government mana ged to continue educational services through and throughout the operation (this point is additionally shown in sources iii and four).This suggests emptying was a success.Though, as the photo shows evacuation in a positive light, it could suggest a propaganda element. However, though possible, it seems unlikely that the photo is arranged making it tried and true to determine evacuation as a success through child well-being and happiness. Furthermore, a keep an eye on of it being successful in this way is source three, a newspaper extract from Kent, folk 1939. The overall impression given is that evacuation was very much a successful operation.According to the source for the majority, it was a happy adventure and homesickness quickly fled. Again, this suggests success in the well being of the evacuees, though the source goes on to show this further saying that children were eating high teas beyond their dreams and went up to bedrooms elephantine than thought possible.From this we can infer that evacuation was a success in the way that children were living better out in the countryside not only for safety, but for lifestyle as well.However, this source is much less(prenominal) reliable that source one as it appears to be in incident very biased as a newspaper nerve-wracking to inculpate the best out of evacuation to keep morale high, so it is harder to attain a conclusion of success from the source. Another way in which success is shown through the sources is that evacuation did the job that it was set out to do to shelter the children, and those who are at most risk, from the danger of state of war, specifically bombing in the city.Source five is a picture viewing a bombed school playground in London.From this, we can infer that this is an example of what the government was trying to move children/evacuees away from. It also shows how, being a school playground, children were so at risk, hence, by sending the children away, they were, as far as we know, doing a good job of keeping them safe. Overall, this source shows that evacuation was successful as we can infer that children would clearly be safer out of the city, thus justifying evacuation itself. To further justify evacuation and at that placefore show its success in keeping evacuees safe, source six shows casualties in Liverpool.It shows that the death rate was largely over 100 and even in May 1941, at 1453. Again, this justifies the necessitate to evacuate and the safety achieved through evacuation.Finally, sources three shows the success in evacuation as the sources show effectualness and good organisation as a success of evacuation. This encompasses overall efficiency and pre-evacuation planning. To be able to rape the coarse amount of 1 meg (intended 4million) to the countryside required this efficiency and overall, sources three and source two point out the efficiency and order of the transport (trains) and organisation in the countryside.In source three, a newspaper article from Kent, says that the departures were efficient, reflecting that it was seen to that each child got milk and food, and followed up with no confusion.Even source two, though showing evacuation in a negative way, also comments that the trains ran to time and that evacuation came tell apart with teachers. Having teachers is shown in sources one, three and four as well. In source one, it is shown as a teacher with a group of children, in three there are mentioned teachers in charge and in four, the graph shows about 103,000 teachers were evacuated.The fact that they were able to organise having teachers for the children, as well as having sufficient transport for a million people, shows great planning and effectiveness of the evacuation architectural plan as a success in World War Two.On the other hand, evacuation can be seen as self-defeating through the sources. One point is that of numbers according to source four, 4 million had been planned for but only 1 . 5million went.Source four is most probably reliable as it is a textbook extract, with the main aim of to inform, and thus the historian writing this has no reason to twist the truth. Even though this shows efficiency, it shows how evacuation was not successful, as it didnt go according to governments plans. It also could suggest that the public didnt see quite the same urgency to evacuate as the government.This interpretation is further shown as one of the sources is a propaganda poster discouraging mothers to bring their children back to the city.This shows this unsuccessful side to evacuation as it shows that mothers needed this encouragement though posters. This shows how evacuation was unsuccessful in encouraging the public. Source seven suggests that social barriers were scattered with the effect of showing one side of the nation to the other, so far two sources suggest different source 2, a source showing a mainly negative view on evacuation, implies that the social debt instrument was not evenly spread and that the poor housed the poor and the wealthy evaded their responsibilities.This is an exchange view that people werent treating the evacuees correctly that goes against mainly source one and three. Source one and three are both from the start of the war (1939 specifically) and therefore could be seen as too specific to generalise a positive experience for the duration on the war and that perhaps source two, a negative view, is a better outlook, despite being a secondary source, on the success of the war as it shows a view over time.Considering all the elements that determine whether The evacuation of children in World War Two was a great success, I believe that evacuation was in fact a success in most ship canal of measuring success the overall operation fulfilled its aims of protect children from bombs to safer quieter areas of the country (like source one depicts) and that the government did so in an orderly, effective fashion.However, I wou ld not call the evacuation programme a only a success nor a great success thorough considering that less went than planned and that it is difficult to derive a positive experience from the evacuees themselves. A great success suggests complete fulfilment of original plans and a large majority happy and well treated in the operation. Not all sources agree with this, thus, overall, I conclude my agreement that evacuation in World War Two was successful, though not a great success.