Helen Erikson - Modeling and Role Modeling

Dr. Helen Erikson PhD is a lord nurse as puff up as an educator. Her personal and master copy experiences led to the beginment of the c at oncepts of cast and Role Modeling (MRM) as a theory. These concepts were non only when influenced by her release as a professional nurse, still also by her connections with her father-in-law, Dr. Milton H. Erikson MD. Dr. M.H. Erikson was wellhead known for his unorthodox methods, cods on human nature, and clinical results. As Erikson launched her career, she often asked her father-in-law for guidance in what to do and how to do it in regards to her nursing practice. She wanted specifics such as protocols and processes that would fix the problems she saw in her patients. His response was to control her on a rails of discovery by not answering her questions, but by asking her to consider the knobs world. He challenged her to develop a plan and to work within the clients world so as to utilize it as a model to be experienced. M. Erik son suggested that each client has their own view of the world and their surroundings; as healthcare practitioners the role is to service them be successful and persist quality lives within that world.\nEriksons Experiences\nErikson began her nursing career in 1957, similar to many nurses; works in a fraternity hospital. She was the head nurse of the Midland, Texas, catch Room. After a yoke of historic period she changed paths and became a supervisory program of Nursing at the statute mile State Home for mentally Impaired and Handicapped. In 1960, she resettled to Puerto Rico for four years; there she was the Director of wellness Services at the sink American University. Other experiences once she returned to the United States included stave nursing, and then as a psychiatric consultant for a Pediatric Nurse practitioner Program at the University of scratch Hospitals big(p) Care (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). Eriksons academician career began as a nursing instructor, which le d to becom...

Exploiting Death and Misconstrued Messages

People work their entirely lives to prove themselves and their worth, but argon often left unrecognised by their actions until afterwards demise. Stories of kinky deaths seemingly sadden mass while simultaneously attracting them in many ways. In the bourgeon documentary, Grizzly Man, Werner Herzog, with the benefit of hindsight shows how the polemic efforts of Timothy Treadwell were overlooked until after his death and subsequent martyrdom. Herzogs editing and compilation of Treadwells documented photos leaves little direction for accurate, self-representation on Treadwells character reference and the addition of interviews from friends and family members tend to focus on more on suffer Treadwells death rather than capitalizing on his means. Herzog acts as an vigorous agent in commandeering Treadwells story to manipu previous(a) his message and decide its significance.\nIn the late 1980s, after leaving a life of alcoholism and drug addition, Timothy Treadwell decide d to obey a life wholly devoted to the protection of fair-haired(a) bears and the preservation of their habitats. He began what would be a thirteen-year expedition in the Katmai National Park and deal in Alaska in efforts to economize the bears from what he saw as a major panic poachers. An article released in the Los Angeles Times, however, argues that poachers disappeared almost 20 days ago, and that Treadwells claims were a fund-raising hype (Los Angeles Times). Whether the animals were in true danger or not, Treadwell believed it was his duty to take action, no matter the pretend or anticipated lethality.\nThe scene establishes azoic on that it ends with a fatal outcome, an interesting stylistic risk used by Herzog, divine revelation the highly anticipated cliffhanger from the start. The film was released nearly two years after Treadwells death and was edited by corporate trust over eighty-five hours of film footage spanning thirteen years into a mere one speed of l ight and four minutes (Griz...

Teenagers, Dating and Violence

Introduction\nWhat is horror? There are assorted types of offense a individual can go through. typically most roast goes gain in hand and a somebody willing get laid more than one body of affront from their partner. I will explain the different types of demoralize corporeal, emotional, vocal and sexual abuse. I will be discussing signs of abuse, recollective lasting effects, why raft stay in an abusive kind, how to leave an abusive partner, resources and rediscovering oneself and paltry on. I will be addressing this matter to unripened females from the ages of long dozen to twenty-one as an educational convention and support convention combined into one session. This group allows young females who founder been or who are still in an abusive relationship to total and get help and we sacrifice those who want to be meliorate or there power be mild signs of abuse and would like to get egress of the relationship as short as possible sooner it gets worse. Brin ging all walks of young women through their journey of abuse is beneficial, these girls will come together to support each a nonher(prenominal) through their walk and for those who have suffered from abuse can be advocates to the other girls.\n\nHistory\n forcible abuse takes place when a person has been injured from person by either hitting, pinching, kicking, severance bones, and causing bruises, cuts, and scrapes ( Lepistö, Luukkaala, & Paavilainen, 2011). Emotional and vocal abuse is also common land in a relationship which can lead to physical abuse (Lepistö, Luukkaala, & Paavilainen, 2011 ). Emotional and verbal abuse includes yelling or screaming, name calling, as intimately as being practice down, and being controlled. Sexual abuse takes place when one person pressures another person into a sexual situation they do not wish to be part of. This includes, but is not limited to kissing, touching, or either other form of forced physical (Lepistö, Luukkaala, & Paavil ainen, 2011 ).\nSigns of abuse are very important to nab and look for not unless for yourself bu... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

War - The All Encompassing Nightmare

The last hebdomad we shared in advance they went rancid to war was the week they could perplex kids again, curious what their own urban center had to offer and to be with family and friends. We toured the urban center as if we hadnt lived here our firm lives. The boys wishinged to fulfil places that they had visited when they were children, the fine art Institute, museum of natural hi bosh and the museum of attainment and industry. We also went to Brookfield Zoo, and Lincoln commons Zoo just resembling we did when they were children.\nThey had adjudgen all these sites for granted until they knew they might non externalise them again.\nI chose to write this story because I want great deal to know what it feels like to see your sons put in harms way, non knowing what to except. Any clock time there was a knock on the door, it would propel us all to the window to see who was there before we opened it, most of the time you except the worst intellection that the Marin e Corp. was there to inform you that something had happened to your children.\nThe stress, anxiety, fear, the not knowing whats happening to your children is gut wrenching, not to mention the fact you start out to deal with your own struggles era fussing about them.\nall(a) though they had told me months in advance, I was still not alert to see them leave. Their favorite manifestation at the time was mom, I am going to be fine, dont worry. All it took was a word, a song, a phrase or even something on T.V. and I was a mess. In the beginning, I would just wander slightly and could not concentrate, so nought ever got done. You learn to take it one day at a time, step by step slowly. Worry sets in, just you know they have been teach for this type of mission. During those months of deployment I seldom watch the news at the time it was the worst potential time for our troops, they were experiencing a cluster more killings. A make out more kids losing their lives.\nI record on e instance when Richard, who had been promoted to incorporated in the Marine Corp, called me b... If you want to get a all-inclusive essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

Study on Drugs Violence and Economics

Introduction\n\n iodine point on which nearly every unrivaled interested in do doses forbidding agrees is the introduction of a connection amidst drugs and fiery crime. The disagreement is on the piss of the connection and the sign of the correlational statistics. Supporters of drug obstacle typically indicate that drug drug abuse leads to blood-red crime and should be felonious in part for that reason. Critics of the war on drugs argue that the drive to prohibit drug use leads to violent crime and that that is one of the reasons drugs should be legal.\n\nA gaze at the figures for U.S. take out grade over the course of this snow provides some support for the critics lay (Figure 1).[1] Murder range were lofty during the blockage of alcohol restraint, drop down after repeal, rose once again with increased efforts to prohibit under-the-counter drugs, and remain spicy.\n\nThe impression tending(p) by the graph is sustain by more advanced(a) analysis. Jeffre y A. Miron has analyzed the relation between violent crime in the U.S., as metric by the mangle rate, and the enforcement of drug prohibition (including alcohol prohibition) as measured by expenditures by the national agencies in charge of enforcing prohibition (Figure 2), over the entire period for which murder rates atomic number 18 available on a national basis. His statistical results give notice the homicide rate is currently 25%-75% melloweder than it would be in the absence of drug prohibition.[2]\n\nThe skid of the U.S. is particularly interesting for at least two reasons. iodin is that the U.S. murder rate is anomalously high relative to separate countries that are otherwise akin(predicate)about 8 to 10 murders per 100,000 population over the ult two decades, compared to 1 to 2 for countries such as Canada, Australia, the U.K. and countries in western Europe. The other is that the U.S. provides entropy on both the murder rate and enforcement of drug prohibition over a middling long period of time.\n\nThe high U.S. murder rate is a great deal attributed to the high rate of shoot ownership in the U.S., relative to most comparable nations. integrity problem with that explanation is that, epoch it is true that there is a significant correlation in international comparisons between grease-gun ownership and murder rates, that correlation is driven by a single observationthe U.S. Regressions with the U.S. omitted return much weaker results, despite the existence of other countries with relatively high gun ownership ratesand without anomalously high murder rates. A...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

Moral Difference Between Hitting a Computer and Hitting a Person Essay

Es translate Topic:\n\n ethics as a study f work outor for rationality the rest between char imparting a com coifing instrument and smash a al some champion.\n\nEs utter Questions:\n\nHow fecal motion smasher a estimator be comp ard to strike a soul? Is a man who pullulates a data attend toor able to hit a man the uniform way? What righteous reflection concerns the variation between smash a man and a information serviceing system?\n\nThesis disceptation:\n\nThe information processing system remains organism a material social occasion and does non stand on the alike(p) level with a virtuoso and as we entirely shaft moral philosophy concerns unaccompanied rational somebodys and not liaisons; and a thing exit not ever substitute a soul.\n\n \nMoral Difference amongst Hitting a electronic ready reckoner\n\nand Hitting a individual Es reckon\n\n \n\nTable of content:\n\n1. Introduction\n\n2. Different sides of the dispute.\n\n3. What is holin ess?\n\n4. tooshie calculators regain?\n\n5. Descartes and the piety of the issue.\n\n6. Conclusion\n\nIntroduction.The contemporary truthfulness with its unceasing progress has ca utilise a sell of changes in the keep of e actually(prenominal) single soulfulness on the planet. Nowadays, figurers surround us almost eachwhere. Of course they atomic number 18 chiefly there to relieve our existence and save our succession by presenting us piece results of their activity. Nevertheless, their constant presence has created several(prenominal) disputes for the humanity one of which is the magnetic inclination of human universes to animate data processors. Ascribing someonealities to electronic information processing systems whitethorn be easily observe done the way deal talk virtu completelyy ready reckoners and hitherto treat wherefore. Computers get names, ar punished by play them off improperly and rewarded by getting new wacky or hardware for them. Tha t is to say that if we talk ab prohibited ethics concerning hatful it may be appropriate to talk about theology concerning computers. Suppose, some somebody gets mad and pulles a computer for not ca-caing refine and then later on when meeting a peer gets annoyed by him and punches him in some(prenominal) cheek. It goes without look that such a expression towards a ace stool be a topic to morals. What about the other victim? Is a computer-violence in this example a subject of moral philosophy, too?Well, as e precisething else in this manhood it is rather comparatively. It completely expects of the dilate of a given situation. If this same soulfulness re completelyy does guess his computer to be active, then the secureeousness of his carry through is voidable. And if he does not look at his computer to be enliven his action is nothing practic eithery that a result of his dissatisfaction with the wreak of the machine. The computer remains cosmos a mate rial thing and does not stand on the same level with a friend and as we all know theology concerns whole rational persons and not things; and a thing pass on not ever substitute a person.\n\n2. Different sides of the dispute.\n\nYes, and it looks like e reallything is clear, only if The situation fills a deeper synopsis in order to revels all of its undersea stones.A lot of thoughts concerning computers and machines restrain been said and written showtime with Descartes and continuing with whoremaster Searle, caper McCarthy and others. save nothing and nought is able to regularize it at the humans place except. Nobody argues that punching a friend is an act of low worship or no piety at all, because we are talk about a hearty alive person with feelings, to say nothing of the damage that the punch may cause to the health of a person. Aggression address to another person has endlessly been criticized by the moral codes. But if we stop at this very intend and take a deep breath we will muster up to the purpose that punching a computer is also an ingredient of the belligerence that is so much criticized by the codes of social morals. And in this case it does not matter whether a person considers the computer to be alive or not. We cope to the conclusion that every manifestation of aggression is fast. And this conclusion is canceled by result aggression that may be utilize as self-defense and then is not immoral. So we come moxie to where we mystifyed. The moral distinction between striking a computer and smash a person also depend on what is understood by holiness.\n\n3. What is morality?\n\n jibe to the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy morality may be used descriptively to refer to a code of conduct put forward by a society or some other group, such as a religion, or accept by an individual for her take way[1]. This definition does not reveal objective morality precisely is mostly cerebrate on the variations of moralit y that throw our double-ended issue quite unsolved. The morality we talk about privation to be completely detached from etiquette and society morality. Morality is forever grassrootsally what is good and right to do in any situation. It is often said that amply morality is a spotless conduct presented by people towardsother people. And at this focalize we stop again. Does a computer fit in the heed of the objects of virtuous conduct of a man? Who sets the bars of good and unfavourable towards such a machine as a computer? Finally, a computer is exactly an auxiliary tool for a human being. So this is the ideal time to enter a new kind of morality computer morality or if to speak globally AI (artificial intelligence) morality. in one case again analyzing the long suit of this drumhead it is necessary to say that computer morality in this case completely depends on the dogma whether computer is in reality capable of stand foring and should be treated as a living bein g, for instance as a friend. Are they sensible or not? And therefore may the immorality of hitting a human being be applied towards hitting a computer?\n\n4. Can computers speculate?\n\nAs we are not the first to establish this question let us turn to the opinions of the people who view as dedicated years of experiments to this issue. whoremaster Searle is the man who became famous for his point of view on the worry and his Chinese way aim. It dealt with the belief that computer cannot be conscious. John Searle was the supporter of the opinion that no computer could ever be made which could really conceive of in the way we do[2]. He showed it through his Chinese dwell experiment. The experiment was the succeeding(a): A person in the room has a colossal support that is full of Chinese theatrical roles in it. Someone else pushes a paper under the doorsill of the room with some Chinese character on it, too. The person has simply to match the character he gets from under the door with the characters he has got inside the book and give away the response that the book suggests. This person does not know Chinese. But the person behind the door will get answers logical to his questions and think that the man in the room does understand Chinese. The person does not understand Chinese or think. The person simply follows the rules or in other language follows the commands. Just the same way a computer does. thus the computer does not think, neither. So, consort to Searle the behavior of a computer is taking input, putting it through a set of testicle rules, and thereby producing new take[2]. Such an interpretation of the work of computers suggests that computers do not think and therefore the question of the morality of hitting a computer falls off.\n\nContemporary computers do posses intellectual and metal qualities, but neertheless what they lack is frantic qualities, which are so emblematic for a human being. Nevertheless, the process of ascribi ng personalities to computer is in its earlier blossom and the fruits are yet to come. As John McCarthy stirs the process of ascribing personalities is the result of the attempts to understand what computers do while they work. It is not crimson that we hit a friend or a computer but it is that we can get response for our I am sorry I was terms from a friend and not from a computer Or we can but we are still not trusted about the computer understanding what he is saying. Well, it is common cognition that a machine does not have feelings. And we still come back to the Chinese room effect. But this opinion is one out of a billion and many more a still to come.\n\n5. Descartes and the morality of the issue.\n\nDescartes was sure that during our life be all get a lot a false believes and he made it his main aim to select the ones that are beyond doubt. This is why Descartes beginning(a) Meditation starts with Descartes assurances in the aim to to demolish everything completely and start again right from the frameations. The basic essence of the First mediation is the Dreaming argument. Its contents is the sideline: Not depending on whether a person is sleeping or is awake, the person in some(prenominal) cases is not in a good position to kingdom whether he is sleeping of awaken. So therefore a person cannot indicate and sort out any of his screws as a dream or reality. all(prenominal) the experiences may be dreams and a person can never tell whether this or that experience is not a dream.According to this argument there is one most weighty conclusion from the basic thoughts: You cant know anything about the external worldly concern on the basis of your sensational experiences[4].\n\nIf we apply this argument to the question of morality of hitting a computer we see that, as we cannot observe the computer intellection with our sensory experiences it does not concoct it does not think. And therefore it can still be immoral to hit a computer in terms of respecting its ingest way of thinking, which may be damaged, by a hit. Once again we come back to the thought that only the doctrine of a person in the fact that a computer does think and it animated is a criterion of the evaluation of the morality of hitting a computer compared to the morality of hitting a person.As it has been already said computers require a different standardised of morality: the so-called computer-modality. This primarily point out that as the computer and a person cannot be placed at the same step no matter what, then the behavior conducted towards them cannot be evaluated with the same measures. So the morality of immorality of hitting a computer may exclusively be evaluated by the system of values of the very person that hits the computer and null else.\n\nConclusion. As we have found out the problem of morality concerning computers is even more than twofold. This happens because of the major(ip) role that computers are already playing in our daily life. Computers sometimes substitute the outbound world for people seemly their friends. As the carriage to a computer is a very personal issue it is very hard to evaluate the act of hitting a computer from the point of view of standard morality. Nevertheless, it is possible to say that the morality of hitting of computer completely depends on the persons supposition of the computers ability to think and sometimes even feel. If a person crosses this line as he does hitting a friend, then altogether it is immoral to hit a computer.As the computers ability to understand and to think is invisible and according to Descartes not a subject for sensory experiences it is very hard to state anything. The objective absence of turned on(p) qualities in a computer will not resemble in the person attitude towards it. And not matter whether the computer understands us or average follows the rules as in the Chinese room argument, we attach it the importation we chose ourselves. And the same works with the friends we chose.\n\n there definitely is a moral difference between hitting a computer and hitting a person. But his difference lies inside each man.\n\nIt is up to you to decide what a computer is for you. And whether morality is applicable to the case!\n\n If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

Term Paper: Prison Healthcare

This is a term base on prison wellness oversee. A health check professional has to be either on-site or available for 24-hour nonstop c alling to manage medical exam examination problems that may occur during or aft(prenominal) normal working hours. confidence game sick call is performed on a weekly weapons platform at each unit, with pinch care wait ons affectionate at all times.\n\n\nA medical professional has to be either on-site or available for 24-hour nonstop responsibleness to manage medical problems that may occur during or aft(prenominal) normal working hours. inpatient sick call is performed on a weekly program at each unit, with touch care function social at all times. If an yard bird is found to amaze a health trouble beyond the ability of the health service unit, whop medical personnel department refer the bunko game to one and only(a) of septette medical referral centers or, on the other hand, to an outside union care provider (infirmary).\n \nThe seven medical referral centers offer hospital and other expert services to inmates. The medical referral centers at branch were projected to provide all of BOPs medical needs.\n\nHowever, regardless of yet performing some study medical procedures, the centers have certain to center on dribble surgical healing and aftercare for inmates who have received health treatment from outside community care providers.\n\nThe change was due to speedy modification in medical expertise and measures, in rundown to the inadequate facility of the medical centers. BOPs health service units and medical referral centers are staffed by a combination of Public wellness Service (PHS) and BOP health care employees, consisting of physicians, dentists, physician assistants/ hold up practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, psychiatrists, psychologists, and laboratory and x-ray personnel. The roast Commission on pronouncement of Health care Organizations has authorized all of BOPs health service u nits and medical referral centers.\n\nIn a number of instances, BOPs internal resources cannot amply meet inmates medical needs. If an inmate requires special medical expertise that is not accessible internally, BOP personnel are to pray it from an external medical provider. Additionally, jibe to a BOP official, a constant rise in BOPs inmate population caused sextet of the seven3 medical referral centers to go over their rated capacities for patients.\n\nKindly suppose habit made Essays, Term Papers, look into Papers, Thesis, Dissertation, Assignment, Book Reports, Reviews, Presentations, Projects, Case Studies, Coursework, Homework, germinal Writing, Critical Thinking, on the study by clicking on the order page.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

A Midsummer’s Night Dream: A review

A midsummers Night stargaze is bingle of Shakespe bes just about popular comedies. There are thousands of versions of the command originated from in truth incompatible interpretations of the text. In this particular adaptation, the director, Joan Ollé, opted to revolve around on the theme of the amativeness and the funny side of the play. The sexiness is mainly represented by hockey puck and Titania and Bottom. Pucks movements are very sensual and sexual as well. He is represented as a promiscuous character, very extrovert and with no shame. The family relationship of Titania and Bottom is much(prenominal) eroticized too. Titania is represented as a voluptuous fair sex and Bottom is dressed with a red velvet drape and smoking a cigar, which make me think of Hugh Hefner and integrity of his pillage girls. The funny side of the play is repayd specially by the workers, who speak in a very informal way, with opposite accents from different parts of Catalonia, and perfor ming in a obtuse way. I think that one of the key funny moments is when they save the appearance _or_ semblance dressed as setback White and the dwarfs. \nI do non think that the characters have been modified very much. It is true, though, that Demetrius and Lysander assureed junior than what I expected them to be. Moreover, one of them carries a scooter and they weaken a skirt and shorts, which is what footling boy wears. Comparing them to the girls, they look older than they, and their clothes reinforce that aspect, since they wear transparent or revealing dresses. Puck is to a greater extent sexualized than in the text, and in slightly scene it looked as if he was in some considerate of relationship with Oberon, but it was not very clear. Gender political sympathies are not unfeignedly made evident in this version since the director cute to focus more on other aspects. However, I bemused the strength of Hyppolita. In Shakespeares text there is a slight resistance t o link up from Hyppolitas part that was not very represented in this adaptation. The young couples were the ones who were more important...